|
Although
the current network caters for only LAC-especially the
pilot sites in Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, and Ecuador-cassava
farmers, end-users, and researchers all over the world
are members of the worldwide CBN.
CBN
members around the world are engaged in several research
and development (R&D) activities aimed at making
cassava more productive. By doing so, they improve the
livelihoods of resource-poor farmers for whom cassava
farming is their mainstay. Activities conducted by CBN
members are summarized in the table and discussion below:
Summary
of On-going Research and Development Activities of CBN
Members
Cassava
Socioeconomics
A
total of 27, independent, organizations in 15 countries
and a CGIAR center, spanning 5 continents-Africa, Asia,
the two Americas, and Europe-are engaged in 24 on-going
R&D activities in the socioeconomics of cassava.
Themes address issues relating to:
-
Farmer
participation in technology development
-
Diversification
of end uses to broaden the crop's market opportunities
-
Status
of cassava production and processing
-
Increasing
the productivity, profitability, sustainability,
and adaptability of cassava technologies in the
developing world
-
Forming
policy guidelines for introducing cassava into the
food security or cash crop economy
-
Potential
effects of more efficient agronomic practices and
use of herbicide-tolerant, high-yielding varieties
under mechanization on the competitiveness of cassava
farming
-
Possibilities
of Substituting more Established Crops like Maize
with Cassava
Postharvest
Handling and Micronutrients
For
cassava to become anything more than the archetypal
food security crop for the peasant, the perishability
of its fresh roots must be addressed, so that these
can be transported over long distances and stored for
long periods, like other roots and tubers such as potato,
yams, and sweet potato. Also, to be accepted as a component
of a safe and balanced diet, its contents of desirable
micronutrients must be improved, and efficient and reliable
processing and detoxifying methods must be developed
and widely adapted. For these reasons, 13 organizations
working on 17 different themes in 10 countries and a
CGIAR center are channeling efforts toward the study
of fresh-root postharvest deterioration, their processing,
and "fortification" when processed to enhance
nutritional value.
Starch
Modification
Even
though cassava starch currently represents only 2% of
the 28 million tons of starch being marketed annually,
probably nothing else holds as much promise for propelling
cassava into the global market as does the marketing
of its starch and derivatives. Cassava starch is beginning
to have both regional and global significance. An outstanding
example is its increased production in Southeast Asia.
Once sub-Saharan Africa and South America begin to produce
and export sizeable quantities of this income-generating
product, its prospects for capturing a major proportion
of the international market are high.
Several
comparative advantages in production and use are encouraging
many industries to adopt cassava starch as an alternative
to traditional sources. Cassava starch is unique for
its very low production costs, high purity, resistance
to acid media and sheer stress, resistance to structural
change under freezing, high viscosity and clear paste
nature, and production of transparent gels. These qualities
give cassava starch the potential to replace most modified
starches used in the food industry.
Currently,
13 organizations in 9 countries and a CGIAR center are
studying cassava starch under 14 themes, with progress
being made in the following areas:
-
Cassava
starch enzymology
-
Starch
biosynthesis pathways
-
Efficient
fermentation methods for high quality in different
starchy attributes
-
Use
of genetic engineering and induced mutagenesis to
produce varieties that have enhanced starch quantities
and qualities, for example, amylose-free starch
-
Modification
of rheological properties in cassava starch
Genomics
Cassava's
shy and asynchronous flowering, coupled with the wide
segregation-characteristic of out-crossing species-hinders
traditional breeding, making it costly and lengthy.
Typically, between 20,000 and 100,000 seedlings are
screened in the first sexual generation, and it takes
8 to 10 years for an improved variety to be released.
Adoption naturally takes much longer. This scenario
is indeed inefficient and needs changing. Molecular
genetics holds special promise for:
-
Developing
molecular tags that can be cheaply and rapidly deployed
for identifying genotypes with sought-after traits
and thereby shunting the notoriously long and costly
growth cycle
-
Facilitating
the "pyramiding" of those genes influencing
agronomic traits of importance, even when they come
from different sources
As
has been shown by their successful application in other
more researched and better-funded crops, molecular genetics,
especially marker-assisted selection (MAS), offer tools
that circumvent many limitations to cassava improvement.
With the discovery of the molecular basis of natural
variation, molecular or DNA markers have rapidly gained
importance in the study of genes, genomes, and genetic
diversity. They represent a limitless source of neutral
markers for the quantitative assessment of genetic diversity
and signposting in gene and genome mapping. Their abundance
in any organism allows them to provide resolution of
genetic relationships, and have led to genome and gene
mapping.
Of
10 research centers in 5 countries of Africa, Europe,
LAC, and North America, the Centro Internacional de
Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) and the International Institute
for Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
have led in the development and application of cassava
molecular genetic tools. Of significance is the development
of the molecular genetic framework map for cassava,
its on-going saturation with markers based on the polymerase
chain reaction (PCR), molecular diversity studies, and
tagging of several important agronomic traits. The robust
DArT, based on a DNA microarray platform, is also being
developed for the rapid saturation of the map and as
a fingerprinting tool.
Genetic
Resources
The
available germplasm of any plant species constitutes
a treasure trove for breeders, who can then exploit
it to improve that plant. Harnessing the incredible
genetic variation available in both cultivated and wild
species, and wild relatives constitutes both a challenge
and an opportunity. This is especially true for cassava,
considering that both it and its relatives have, over
the past 50 years, been widely dispersed from native
South America to far-away Africa and Asia. With the
dispersion, however, new population dynamics of pests
and diseases have developed. For these to be effectively
contained, the genetic base of cultivated cassava varieties
must be continuously broadened.
Cassava
scientists all over the world are therefore dedicating
much effort to understanding, characterizing, conserving,
and exploiting the crop's appreciable genetic resources.
Currently, 29 different organizations in 14 countries
of Africa, Asia, Europe, and LAC and two CGIAR centers
are conducting 29 on-going activities involving cassava
genetic resources. These activities include the genetic
improvement of the crop, diversity studies of gene pools,
and germplasm collection and conservation.
Tissue
Culture and Transgenics
The
cassava crop's future as a food staple and industrial
raw material depends heavily on the production of high-yielding
varieties that are resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses;
on these varieties having roots that, when harvested,
have a long shelf life; and on being able to satisfy
the very high demand for clean planting materials.
However,
cassava's heterozygous nature and long growth cycle
make the development of new varieties highly inefficient.
Its vegetative mode of propagation slows down adoption
of improved varieties and erodes excellent varieties
as the pest and disease loads accumulate. Biotechnology
can help solve these constraints, particularly to the
benefit of the small farmer. For example, genetic transformation
can aid the transfer of single or multiple genes without
dismantling the rest of the genetic structure of excellent
varieties. Rapid in vitro propagation can be
used to mass-produce healthy planting materials.
Cassava
researchers are therefore working on the development
of genetic transformation protocols and efficient regeneration
systems, even for recalcitrant varieties from Africa.
These activities are being complemented by research
on efficient rapid propagation systems. In all, 24 organizations
in 13 countries and 2 CGIAR centers are involved in
37 themes addressing these issues. Also being addressed
are transformation of cassava for resistance to insect
pests and viruses, reduced cyanogenic potential, improved
nutritional qualities, and optimization of cryopreservation
of cassava tissues and its application in germplasm
conservation.
Biotic
Stress
The
cassava crop suffers from several yield constraints,
which must be addressed before it can fulfill its potential
as a future subsistence and industrial crop. Viral and
bacterial diseases are major contributors to yield losses,
with insect pests, nematodes, and weeds also contributing.
These problems are further aggravated by the fact that
cassava is vegetatively propagated, leading to an ever-increasing
accumulation of pathogen loads in the propagules over
successive seasons. This invariably leads to depressed
yields and reduced quality of planting materials.
Of
the diseases, African cassava mosaic disease (ACMD),
caused by several closely related and interacting geminiviruses,
is the single most important in Africa and the most
important vector borne disease of any African food crop.
Another major viral disease of Manihot is the
cassava common mosaic virus, a potexvirus prevalent
in Colombia, Brazil, and Peru, and which can account
for as much as 30% of yield losses. Cassava bacterial
blight, caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv.
manihotis, is the most important worldwide disease
of cassava, responsible, under certain conditions, for
total crop failure in both Africa and South America.
A major insect pest is the whitefly Aleurotrachelus
socialis.
Biotechnology
offers the potential to rapidly transfer resistance
genes from resistant cultivars or wild relatives to
susceptible cultivars, as in the case of CBB. The cassava
research community, represented by 27 institutions in
13 countries and 2 CGIAR centers, is researching 25
themes on solving the biotic constraints to cassava
production. Their multipronged approaches include developing
diagnostic kits for the diseases, molecular characterization
of pathotypes, several biocontrol initiatives, host-plant
resistance studies, breeding, multiplication, and distribution
of clean planting materials
Gene
Discovery
New
genomics tools promise faster discovery of genes that
can be used in genetic transformation or as genetic
markers to increase the efficiency and cost effectiveness
of plant breeding. A crop like cassava, with all its
inherent problems associated with conventional genetic
improvement, needs the intervention of these novel tools
to develop other efficient and reliable tools for the
specific use of crop improvement. Currently, 9 institutions
in 5 countries and 2 CGIAR centers in Africa, Asia,
Europe, LAC, and North America are addressing 13 research
themes on this subject. Some approaches include the
application of proteomics to gene isolation; map-based
gene cloning; development of bacterial artificial chromosome
(BAC) library resources; gene expression microarray
chips; isolation and characterization of tissue-specific
promoters; quantitative trait loci (QTLs) studies; and
the characterization of defense genes.

Activities
of CBN Members by Research Area and Location
|
Research
Activity
|
Organizations
Involved in Cassava Research
|
|
Discipline
|
Topics (no.)
|
Country (a)
|
Continent
|
No.
|
|
Socio-economics
|
24
|
India
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Malawi
|
Africa
|
7
|
|
Ecuador
|
LAC
(b)
|
2
|
|
Colombia
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Vietnam
|
Asia
|
4
|
|
Brazil
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Sweden
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Uganda
|
Africa
|
2
|
|
Ghana
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Chad
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Swaziland
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Zimbabwe
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
USA
|
North
America
|
1
|
|
Thailand
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Cuba
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
CGIAR
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Total
|
15 + CGIAR Center
|
5
|
27
|
|
Postharvest Handling
and Micronutrients
|
17
|
Nigeria
|
Africa
|
3
|
|
Côte
d’Ivoire
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Cameroon
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
France
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Congo (DRC)
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
India
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Denmark
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
UK
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Netherlands
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
USA
|
North
America
|
1
|
|
CGIAR
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Total
|
10 + CGIAR Center
|
5
|
13
|
|
Starch Modification
|
14
|
India
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Brazil
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Argentina
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Ghana
|
Africa
|
2
|
|
UK
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
USA
|
North
America
|
3
|
|
Singapore
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Netherlands
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Trinidad
& Tobago.
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
CGIAR
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Total
|
9 + CGIAR Center
|
5
|
13
|
|
Genomics
|
8
|
Sweden
|
Europe
|
2
|
|
Tanzania
|
Africa
|
3
|
|
USA
|
North
America
|
1
|
|
Bolivia
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Brazil
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
CGIAR
|
Africa
& LAC
|
2
|
|
Total
|
5 + 2 CGIAR Centers
|
4
|
10
|
|
Genetic Resources
|
29
|
India
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
Brazil
|
LAC
|
4
|
|
Sweden
|
Europe
|
4
|
|
Vietnam
|
Asia
|
3
|
|
Japan
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
France
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Malawi
|
Africa
|
3
|
|
Denmark
|
Europe
|
1
|
|
Ecuador
|
LAC
|
2
|
|
Venezuela
|
LAC
|
1
|
|
Uganda
|
Africa
|
1
|
|
Nigeria
|
Africa
|
2
|
|
Ghana
|
Africa
|
2
|
|
Thailand
|
Asia
|
1
|
|
|
CGIAR
|
Africa
& LAC
|
2
|
|
Total
|
14 + 2 CGIAR Centers
|
4
|
29
|
|
Tissue Culture and Transgenics
|
37
|
USA
|
North
America
|
3
|
|
Bolivia
|
LAC
|
2
|
|
Cuba
|
LAC
|
4
|
|
UK
| |