Databases
Colombia
(in Spanish)
Latin America
(in Spanish)
Improved Varieties of CIAT Crops

MODEXC
Economic Surplus Analysis Model

Trends
Beans
Cassava
Milk
Livestock
Rice

Information Resources
Impact Summaries
Publications
Abstracts of CIAT Publications on Impact

About Us
Project Description
Impact of Our Work with National Partners
Partners and Donors

Home > Impact Assessment > Abstracts >

t_Abstracts_of_CIAT_Publications_on_Impact.gif (4720 bytes)


For further information contact: ciat-library@cgiar.org

hyperlink_blanco.gif (163 bytes) Visit our CIAT Libray



Photocopies : [Request, Prices]

General

092
Gottret, María Verónica. White, Douglas. Assessing the impact of integrated natural resources management : CIAT challenges and experiences / María Verónica Gottret and Douglas White. Cali, Colombia : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, [2000] . 36 h. : il. [S 494 .5 .E58 G6]

    Advances and travails of CIAT scientists as they develop and implement an impact assessment (IA) framework for three integrated natural resources management (INRM) sites in Latin America (hillsides, savannas and forest margins) is presented. Also, the importance and growing interest of IA for INRM research as a planning , learning and accountability tool is underlined. The document present a brief historical perspective of the relationship between development thought and IA methodologies, and analyses the major challenges of developing and implementing and appropriate methodology that satisfies the needs of multiple stake holders. A conceptual and analytical framework for INRM research IA, along with first insights about CIAT efforts on implementing an IA process in its INRM sites is proposed. The proposed IA methodology would permit tracking relevant types of changes over time. However, establishing cause-effect or at least influence linkages, is more complex and is not as simple. Therefore, there is a need for further IA research to develop a model for assessing and validating the path-to-development impact in order to evaluate the contribution or at least the influence, of a given intervention to final development goals. This model could also be useful to conduct ex-ante impact analysis of different research and development interventions from organizational models to decision-support tools to technology and information as a criteria for INRM research priority-setting.

093
Janssen, Willem G.; Crissman, Charles; Henry, Guy; López Pereira, Miguel A.; Sanint, Luis Roberto; Walker, Tom. 1992. CIAT, CIMMYT, and CIP : their role in agricultural research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical ; Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo ; Centro Internacional de la Papa. Cali, Colombia. CIAT publication ; no. 213. 54 p. En. (S 540 .8 .C4 C456)

    The report discusses how CIMMYT, CIP, and CIAT interact to develop agriculture, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), according to new research trends directed toward environmental conservation and management. Concrete examples are given of achievements so far attained. Five fundamental criteria should be applied in agricultural R&D: relevancy, social productivity, complementarity, flexibility, and profitability. The report confirms the importance of the three IARCs to LAC and their influence on food production indicators, which, during 1966 to 1989, increased for wheat (95.5 percent), rice (93.5 percent), maize (58.2 percent), beans (11.9 percent), potato (56.5 percent), meat (22.5 percent), and milk (34.3 percent). In Bolivia, the area planted to beans increased from 3,000 ha in 1989 to 26,000 ha in 1991. Also discussed are the factors generating changes in the production, food consumption patterns, and marketing of the products researched by CIAT, CIP, and CIMMYT. The impact of these centers on LAC agriculture is examined in terms of development of improved germplasm; institutional development by strengthening research capacities; development of methodologies; networking and information exchange; crop research and management; and postharvest issues. The benefits likely to be produced by research on these basic products by the year 2010 are also estimated. CIAT, CIP, and CIMMYT will explore other dimensions of technology generation related to economic growth with equity, sustainability, and collaborative efforts with the private sector. Research on the production systems of these commodities must continue if these expected benefits are to be obtained.

094
Pachico, Douglas H. Farmer participatory research : measuring impact. En: International Seminar on Participatory Research Gender Analysis for Technology Development. 9-14 Sep 1996. Cali (Colombia). New frontiers in participatory research and gender analysis : proceedingsCali (Colombia). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. 1997p. 109-111CIAT publication ; no. 294 .[S 540 .8 .C6 N4]

    The major issues in impact assessment for farmer participatory research (FPR) are analyzed. There are many potential ways in which FPR can have an impact; for example, increasing agricultural productivity, improving the management of natural resources or leading to a wider dissemination of innovations. FPR may also be more effective in reaching specific target groups, and it many reduce research costs and develop community capacity. Impact will be measured by different groups, and for different reasons, according to the circumstances. When the time comes to carry out an impact study , the assessors face a number of decisions: What to measure? The impact chosen will depend on the motive for the evaluation. The evaluators will take into account the object of the FDR intervention and also their own intentions for the study. In a typical case applying FPR to increase productivity through technical change, initial outputs could include types of technology, which might encompass new varieties of germplasm, or methodologies for integrated pest management, crop management, or post-harvest. But the ultimate outputs would be the results of applying these improvements, manifested in increased yields, reduced production costs, greater stability, or improved sustainability. Types of impact to be measured may include enhanced diffusion, measured in terms of increased rapidity, spatial distribution, or diversity of users. It’s important to ascertain that the technologies are reaching the people who need them: especially those without other resources, women, ethnic groups, or people in marginal areas.

095
Pachico, Douglas H. Innovation indicators in the agricultural sector in Latin America. En: Research Evaluation (United Kingdom). 1996. v. 6(3) p. 205-208

    Technological innovation is a major element of agricultural policy in Latin America. Latin American governments invest substantial amounts of their scarce financial and human resources in improving agricultural output and return on investment. It is possible to identify the impact of major technical innovations in agriculture through monitoring productivity measures. In a region where indicators of innovation are poorly developed, and where it is useful to be able to demonstrate the impact of technical innovations to politicians and policy-makers, indicators of innovation in the agricultural sector provide a good case study of the benefits of investment in innovation.

096
Pachico, Douglas H. The distribution of benefits from ownership rights in genetic resources : the case of beans / Douglas Pachico. Cali, Colombia : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 2000. 10 h. : il. [62563]

    With the advent of biotechnology and the emergence of property rights in genetic materials, the economic value of genetic resources is an issue of growing importance. Since neither genetic resources nor their use is equally distributed, this paper develops a model to assess the distribution of benefits from ownership and use of cultivated and wild bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genetic resources. First, this paper quantitatively estimates the potential magnitude of royalty incomes that would accrue to countries of origin of germplasm. Second, it breaks down royalty flows by countries, thereby revealing significant intra-regional variation in the distribution of benefits. Third, a distinction is made between payment for land races versus wild germplasm. Finally, an estimate of net benefit's from germplasm is presented, taking into account royalty receipts, royalty payments, and the increase in productivity due to the use of improved germplasm. The paper finds that a system of ownership rights in bean germplasm would generate income flows for countries that own major sources of diversity. High income gene-poor countries of the north, would indeed make payments to low income, gene-rich countries in the south. However, many low income countries in the south are also poorly endowed with genetic diversity, and would also be net payers for the use of germplasm. Most countries in the south would have far more to gain from increases in productivity due to utilizing germplasm, than they would from receiving royalty payments for the ownership of germplasm.

097
Pachico, Douglas H. Ashby, Jacqueline Anne. Farrow, Andrew. Fujisaka, Sam. Johnson, Nancy C. Winograd, Manuel. Case study and empirical evidence for assessing natural resource management research : the experience of CIAT. Nairobi (Kenya) : International Council for Research in Agroforestry, [1998] 19 p. [S 540 .E92 P3]

    Natural resource management research emerged in the mid 1980's as a major concern for the global agricultural research system, both national programs and international centers. Assessing the impact of this research inevitably became a critical issue, both for prioritizing research and also for monitoring progress. Impact assessment has become an especially thorny issue because natural resource management research has represented an expansion of the research agenda for many institutions a time when resources have become increasingly scarce. A variety of different methods and tools for assessing impact have been utilized, including indicators; spatial models and geographical information systems (GIS); economic surplus models; farmer participatory techniques; and empirical field surveys. This paper explores some conceptual and methodological issues related to the assessment of impact of natural resource management (NRM) research and presents a brief overview of some research approaches. The experience of CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical), with emphasis on Latin America, is used as a vehicle of this paper because it illustrates a number of the issues that are confronting a wide range of institutions and scientists today. While CIAT can not offer a fully developed model that provides a comprehensive solution to all the issues faced in impact assessment of NRM research today, examination of its experience may serve as a useful platform to stimulate an exchange of experiences and viewpoints in this workshop. The first section of the paper attempts to appraise the broader context of impact assessment for NRM research. It briefly reviews some dimensions, approaches, and aspects of the reach of impact assessment of NRM research. The second section of the paper sketches out the broad outlines of some methodological approaches to NRM impact assessment. Ex ante approaches are considered, and some aspects of poverty measurement, extrapolation, and cross scale analysis are noted. The third and final section of the paper will present brief summaries of the findings of some studies focussing on the impact of NRM research.

098
Pachico, Douglas H.. Hertford, Reed. De Janvry, Alain. Assessing the impact of agricultural research on poverty alleviation : some issues and priorities. En: Food Policy (United Kingdom)Vol. 25, no.4 (Aug. 2000), p. 379-388

    Poverty and hunger persist in the world. Can the significant investments in agricultural research of the developing countries and the approximately US$350 million invested annually by the international community in the CGIAR truly contribute to reducing poverty in the low-income countries? Is poverty reduction feasible objective for agricultural research, involving the range of biological, social, management and policy sciences? How might agricultural research best improve the conditions of the poor? Has improvement, in fact, been occurring? What kinds of agricultural research project designs, especially on the part of CGIAR centres, could lead to further abatement of poverty?. These are some of the many questions that motivated an international workshop in San José, Costa Rica, from September 14-16, 1999, entitled "Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Research on Poverty Alleviation". Although rural poverty in the Americas constituted a starting point, urban poverty and the implications of presentations and findings for all developing regions were included because the forum was global in nature and concerned with poverty in all sectors. The workshop focussed on four main themes: 1. Sharpening understandings about poverty-Update and sharpen perspectives on the extent, trends and dimensions of poverty. 2. Clarifying the research-poverty linkages-Reduce the expanse of controversy concerning the impacts of agricultural research on the poor. 3. Testing the resource degradation-poverty linkages-Test whether agricultural research focused on the improvement of natural resources deserves a priority emphasis in a portfolio of projects that seeks to alleviate poverty. 4. Recommending institutional architectures for increased poverty impacts-Offer guideposts concerning needed changes in institutions and research systems to alleviate poverty. Abstracts of all the workshop papers and complete versions of most are available on the CIAT Web page (www.ciat.cgiar.org). From the 76 papers invited and contributed for the workshop, the Guest Editors have selected a small set in each of the four principal theme areas for inclusion in this Special Edition of Food Policy.

099
Rivas Ríos, Libardo. Adopción, medición del uso de innovaciones tecnológicas, patrones de uso, medición de la productividad / Libardo Rivas R.. Cali, Colombia : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 1999. 9 h. : il. [62559]

    Concepts and proposals about the adoption of agricultural innovations are reviewed, based on several studies about the topic. Adoption is understood as the process by which farmers replace one activity with another unknown activity, which involves learning and changing the production function. Innovation adoption by one farmer changes his/her individual production function, and when several producers of a given geographical area adopt that innovation, it becomes aggregate adoption. Final adoption occurs over the long term, and can be defined as the degree of use of a given technology when farmers completely understand the characteristics, risks, uses, productivity, and potential profitability of the new technology. Adoption studies should be considered from the technological generation viewpoint. Some authors propose that “technology generation-impact” is linear and sequential, beginning with basic and applied research, followed by extension activities, and finally emerging into “adoption-dissemination-impact”. The main objectives of adoption studies are to: (1) measure the degree of adoption, (2) determine adoption dynamics, (3) identify critical factors influencing adoption, and (4) generate relevant information to conduct ex-post impact assessment studies. Not all adoption processes present the same speed and intensity over time because these vary depending on the product, the region, the farmer segment, and the production system. Technological adoption studies are highly complex because the variables included-economic, sociological, physical, and agronomic-are highly diverse. Adoption studies should have a multidisciplinary approach to thus encompass, understand, and quantify this complexity, whenever possible. Adoption studies seek to measure the use of a specific technology in a given population, over a given period of time, which means that both spatial and temporal dimensions are involved.

100
Rivas Ríos, Libardo. García, James Arbey. Seré Rabé, Carlos. Jarvis, Lovell S. Sanint, Luis Roberto. Pachico, Douglas H. Economic surplus analysis model (MODEXCO) / Libardo Rivas R., James A. García, Carlos Seré, Lovell S. Jarvis, Luis R. Sanint and Douglas Pachico. Cali, Colombia : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 1999. 61 p. : il. [HB 141 .R5]

    The economic surplus model MODEXC is a useful tool for estimating several indicators that will help prioritize technologies (ex-ante analysis) and then evaluate them after their adoption and dissemination (ex-post analysis). This last version of MODEXC not only calculates the total surplus attributable to the series of technologies under study, but also estimates individual technological benefits attributable to a given technology and dístributes them between producers and consumers. This manual refers exclusively to the latest version of MODEXC, which runs in Excel. MODEXC can also be used with Lotus 1-2-3 (English versions 3 and 4). For the numerous researchers in Latin America and the Caribbean, Excel and Lotus 1-2-3 are the calculation programs most widely available and easily accessible. The speed with which information is processed will basically depend on the hardware and on the version of software used. MODEXC can be run in Lotus 1-2-3, versions 1 and 2, using the file MODEXC2.wk1, and with versions 3 and 4 using the fíle MODEXC3.wk3. The MODEXC version for Excel 97 corresponds to the file MODEXC.xIt. This tool can also be used in market analysis, even in situations where technological change is absent; equity, or how the benefits of technological change are distributed among the diferente social groups; technological compotents (new variety, new imput or practices); and spillovers, or indirect effects.

101
Rivas Rios, Libardo. López, Gabriel. Pachico, Douglas H.. Evolución de la productividad agropecuaria en Colombia 1970-1997 / Libardo Rivas, Gabriel López y Douglas Pachico. Cali, Colombia : Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 1998 . 34 h. : il.. .[HD 9410 .R58]

    The evolution of Colombia’s agricultural sector is analyzed for 1970-1997 regarding three issues: (1) analysis of the sector’s historical development, with special emphasis on the 90s; (2) estimate of production indexes, inputs, and multifactorial productivity; and (3) adjustment of econometric models to identify factors influencing productivity. Three periods can be clearly differentiated in the evolution of the national agricultural sector periods based on the dynamics of total production and multifactorial productivity (MFP). During the 70s, internal and external conditions facilitated high growth rates of total product, high incorporation rates of inputs into the productive apparatus, and a moderate but significant increase in productivity. The 80s were marked by a low agricultural production growth rate and stagnant levels of productivity. The 90s were characterized by institutional and policy changes that have slowed down agricultural growth, reduced cultivated areas and rural employment, and increased dependency on imported food. During the long study period (1970-1997), few products have successfully maintained high and stable production growth rates. Among these are exportable products or products with a high local agroindustrial demand, such as flowers, oil palm, peanut, fruit trees, and banana. In most of these crops, increased production was mainly based on increase in cultivated areas. The low growth rate of production and the unemployment of production resources in Colombia’s rural sector during the 1990s can be attributed mainly to the reduced income-return. Although the economic aperture helped reduce production costs, the fall of real prices of agricultural products in domestic markets voided any positive effect on income-return. Changes in income-return restored aggregate production, and permanent or plantation crops gained importance. Overall, the performance of products related to CIAT’s international mandate (beans, rice, cassava, milk, and beef) has been acceptable in terms of productivity, especially during the 1990s, which was considered a critical time. Although productivity has had a significant effect on production growth, pertinent efforts must continue to thus increase the competitiveness of national agricultural production. The rigorous selection and prioritization of agricultural activities showing high potential in domestic and external markets, together with the development of viable and sustainable technological alternatives, are fundamental to any strategy seeking modernization of the country’s agricultural sector.

102
Wood, Stanley. Baitx, Wilfred. DREAM : manual para el usuario. San José (Costa Rica) : Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura ; Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo ; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, 1998 . 55 p. Priorización de la investigación agropecuaria en América Latina y el Caribe ; no. 2. .[HD 30 .23 W6]

    The DREAM (Dynamic Research Evaluation Management) software for Windows 95 supports economic impact assessment of agricultural research under a broad range of real or potential conditions, and focuses on the assessment of new technologies or practices applied at the farm level. The software aims to provide analysts with a tool for generating relevant and structured information to help in decision-making regarding policies, strategic options, identification of priorities, and allocation of resources for agricultural research. Research results normally affect yields and/or production costs directly, and their impact at a broader level depends on the adoption and market characteristics of the products involved. DREAM requires users to provide estimates of several factors complying with these characteristics. This program can work with simple or very complex problems, and its options include several regions trading among themselves, dynamic treatment of supply and demand curves, and a range of options to represent transfer and adoption of technology, among others. The procedures for installing the software are given, and information is provided on program structure, logic of interface, steps to create and run a typical scenario, organization and definition of analyses, and data management. A conceptual description of the model is also provided.

[Foreword] [Beans: Africa] [Beans: Latin America] [Cassava] [Forages] [Rice: Latin America] [Savannas] [General] [Author Index]


Copyright © Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical 2001.  All rights reserved.