Products
13 Handbooks for
the Local Agricultural Research Committee (CIAL)
Logistic Preference Ranking Analysis for Evaluating Technology Options
Farmer Evaluation of Technology: Methodology for Open-ended Evaluation
Farmer Evaluations of Technology: Preference Ranking
All Participatory Research-related Products
Reseach Activities
Training
The CIALs at a Glance
Comités de Investigación Agrícola Local, CIAL (in Spanish only)
Data Base (in Spanish only)
Directory
People You Ought to Meet
Investing in Farmers as Researchers, Book

About Us
Project Description
Our Team
Research Themes
Partners and Donors

CIAT Home > Participatory Research >

t_Research_Themes.gif (2201 bytes)


For further information contact :
Carlos Arturo Quirós


Participatory Improvement of Cassava and Field Beans

So that newly generated agricultural technologies are successfully transferred, we need a methodology that takes into account the opinions of both intermediary and final users. This means studying the needs, objectives, farmers’ circumstances, and market conditions, so that, in accordance with these factors, more appropriate technologies with better opportunities for adoption are developed.

The application of the participatory research methodology for improving crops such as cassava and field beans came about in response to the low index of adoption of improved varieties developed jointly by CIAT and Latin American and Caribbean national programs during the 1970s and 1980s.

Transfer and adoption begin when farmers try out and evaluate a technological component in experimental fields established on their farms. The varietal component is always relevant when it attempts to improve the production and marketing potential of a given region. Normally, breeders select these varieties for their superior and stable performance over several years and at different sites, and for their tolerance, moreover, of pests, diseases, and adverse climatic factors. However, new varieties are not always adopted, in contrast to local varieties. The latter are widely distributed in the country’s cropping regions, despite their average production often being less than that of the materials offered by breeders.

Participatory research is a promising alternative, not only for the varietal component, but also for a broad range of technologies applied in different cropping systems. This methodology complements traditional research in that it integrates the criteria of final users with those of breeders, thereby maximizing the efficiency with which new varieties are selected and disseminated.

The system of technology generation and dissemination, based on activities developed by different international agricultural research centers and national institutions, consists of a series of interactions, to each of which the concepts of participatory research can be applied. For technology, for example, varieties improved from germplasm generated by research centers, to have relevant impact in a given area, the centers should take into account researchers from national programs, the farmers who will eventually cultivate the new varieties, and processors and end consumers of the final product. All these actors will help refine the selection criteria that will finally lead to the successful development and dissemination of improved technologies.

Contact: Luis Alfredo Hernández


Participatory Evaluation of Agricultural Technologies

evaluando_maiz.jpg (13737 bytes)Frequently, farmers do not use a new technology in the way that the scientists expect. Many times, agronomic recommendations have been ignored, for example, equipment is not adopted or new crop varieties are rejected. Other practices, not recommended by technicians nor applied in agricultural research stations, have spread rapidly from farmer to farmer. Often, these activities initiated by farmers had not been anticipated by the professionals involved in technology development and transfer. This phenomenon is cause for concern for professionals, many of whom believe that the research used to develop technologies directed at small farmers was missing an element: the farmer’s active participation.

Professionals from different scientific disciplines are specialized in understanding a particular aspect of an agricultural problem. However, no specialist knows as much as does the farmer the different problems and needs of his or her small family production unit, and none are as well equipped to visualize how a technology would function on the farm in meeting those needs. The farmer is the one who finally decides if a technology is useful or not.

Contact: José Ignacio Roa


Interinstitutional Consortium for Sustainable Agriculture in Hillsides (CIPASLA)

The IPRA Project applies its participatory methodology through teamwork with different organizations, NGOs, GOs, or grassroots organizations. One example is the Interinstitutional Consortium for Sustainable Agriculture in Hillsides (CIPASLA).

CIPASLA is a nonprofit consortium, formed by 15 institutions that include entities from the public sector, NGOs, and international bodies. Their mission is to work together to develop and improve the standards of living of the inhabitants of the Ovejas River Watershed, Department of Cauca, Colombia. Their work is carried out through organized activities that are based on the principles of the logical chain of sustainability, while respecting local values and culture: organization, training, research, production, conservation of natural resources, processing, and marketing.

The Consortium interacts with the community through the Association of Beneficiaries of the River Cabuyal Watershed (ASOBESURCA). This brings together the different organizational levels existing in the region and counts on community representation through the Governing Board and the General Assembly of CIPASLA Members. All participate in the definition and approval of plans to be carried out in the area, and perform citizen vigilance in project implementation.

Objectives are to:

  • Strengthen the capacity of community organizations for self-management (e.g., generate resources and formulate projects).
  • Carry out community programs for environmental and cultural education.
  • Develop technical and socioeconomic training programs that help improve levels of participation.
  • Introduce, recover, and validate practices for managing live cover to stabilize soils and improve water management.
  • Recover and introduce alternatives that will guarantee food security and production in agricultural and livestock systems.
  • Reduce deforestation in vital areas.
  • Introduce soil conservation practices.
  • Identify supply and demand for water resources and prepare methodologies to identify potential irrigation areas for hillsides.
  • Improve the efficiency of current markets and study the feasibility of creating new channels through processing and adding value to products.
  • Coordinate activities that help implement projects for developing basic infrastructure and sanitation.
  • Develop a methodological model that can be replicated in other watersheds. This is a fundamental objective of the Consortium.

Contact: José Ignacio Roa


Multipurpose Forages

The IPRA Project and the CIAT’s Tropical Forages Project are collaborating to incorporate participatory evaluation as the key element in researchers’ work. The two Projects receive collaboration from other institutions such as the Directorate of Agricultural and Livestock Science and Technology (DICTA) of Honduras, the Technical Services for Sustainable Development (SERTEDESO), the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock of Costa Rica (MAG), the Ecological Foundation for the Tropics (ECOTROPICA) of Costa Rica, and the Nicaraguan Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Technology (INTA).

When breeders consider incorporating varieties of grasses or legumes with different traits into a genetic improvement program, farmers’ opinions greatly assist in identifying those varietal traits that would have greater or lesser acceptability. These opinions are obtained through participatory evaluations and are recorded in a format designed for this purpose. Once the information is processed, the researchers identify, through research centers, those varieties that have the traits requested by the farmers. Thus, closer coincidence of criteria develop between researchers and farmers and, usually, thereby leading to increased adoption of the technology and, hence, its dissemination.

Contact: Luis Alfredo Hernández

hyperlink_blanco.gif (163 bytes) Visit the CIAT Tropical Forages Web site


Sustainability of CIALs and Second Order Organizations

For a new phase, the IPRA Project’s goal is to promote sustainable rural development by expanding the capacities of resource-limited rural communities of Latin America. The idea is to help solve some agricultural and environmental problems, take advantage of economic opportunities, and integrate these opportunities within broader activities of community development such as health and education.

The short-term future goal of CIALs is to seek the sustainability of community research services through its consolidation into associations of second order such as corporations, associations, and foundations. These organizations are integrated in the broader management activities of community development and have solid links with the formal research sector.

To achieve this goal, the Project will develop, strengthen, and integrate within community networks local research organizations that promote voluntary work; serve disadvantaged groups; integrate with other community development activities, creating links with them; and, in their locality, be directed, administered, and made accountable according to the civil responsibilities demonstrated in their communities.

Collaborating members will be local communities, CIALs and their associations, national agricultural research organizations, NGOs, and Central and South American universities. This phase of the Project will last 3 years.

Contact: Carlos Arturo Quirós


Copyright © Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical 2001.  All rights reserved.