Products
News Releases
CIAT in Perspective (Annual Report)
Growing Affinities (Institutional Bulletin)

Image Gallery
Photos
Videos

Communications at CIAT
Community Communications
Corporate Communications
Publications Distribution

Home > Newsroom > CIAT in Focus 2004-2005 >

Institutional annual report.


For further information contact:
Communications Unit


[<< previous theme] [next theme >>]

CIAT in Focus 2004-2005

Research-for-Development Highlights

Stories about progress toward a more competitive and sustainable agriculture

 

 

The marketplace at Punata, Cochabamba Department, Bolivia.

In the sections that follow, we present highlights from the three global research-for-development challenges—Agrobiodiversity, Agroecosystem Management, and Rural Innovation—that guide the work of CIAT’s projects. Each of the stories told here represents a step forward on the road to a more competitive agriculture that is economically and socially sustainable.

“Smart” fertilizers and nitrogen-efficient crops

Researchers at CIAT and the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS) are moving full steam ahead to exploit a rare biochemical phenomenon from some tropical pasture grasses—biological nitrification inhibition (BNI). Triggered by chemical compounds released from the roots of an African grass widely grown in South America, this natural process, once harnessed, is expected to make nitrogen fertilizer use far more efficient.

Nitrification is a process in which soil bacteria convert ammonium—the nitrogen form in most commercial fertilizers—into nitrite, and then into nitrate, releasing nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas, in the process. Although nitrate is crucial to the growth of nearly all crops, most of it leaches down to the subsoil and often pollutes surface and groundwater. So, finding a way to slow down nitrification to a rate compatible with good crop growth would both reduce fertilizer requirements and minimize the deleterious impacts of agriculture on the environment.

In 1982, CIAT scientist Rosemary Sylvester-Bradley noticed that soil in which the forage grass Brachiaria humidicola was growing had more ammonium and less nitrate than would normally be expected. This observation has led to research collaboration between CIAT and JIRCAS on BNI.

A joint JIRCAS-CIAT project, launched in January 2002, aims to get to the bottom of the BNI phenomenon and put it to practical use. The incentive to combat nitrification is strong. The direct economic cost of nitrogen losses in cereal production alone is estimated at US$16.4 billion per year. Moreover, global agriculture continues to be an important source of the greenhouse gases implicated in global warming, and nitrate pollution of water is a growing threat to the environment and human health.

Recent advances are highly promising. The JIRCAS team has perfected a test that identifies and measures the BNI trait. Joint work by JIRCAS and CIAT in 2004 also proved that B. humidicola root exudates are highly effective at inhibiting nitrification in soil and that the effect is long-lasting. JIRCAS researchers G.V. Subbarao and Osamu Ito believe that unravelling the mechanisms of BNI in B. humidicola will have important implications for developing “smart” nitrogen fertilizers that do not undergo rapid nitrification in soils.

The work to date suggests several promising strategies to harness BNI, some of which are currently being pursued. During 2004 the CIAT team used the JIRCAS assay to screen 10 samples of B. humidicola from the Center’s seed bank. “We found three accessions of B. humidicola that have significantly greater capacity for BNI than the standard cultivar Tully, and we’re now testing these in the field,” says Marco Rondón, a biogeochemist with CIAT’s Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF) Institute.

Apart from conventional breeding to enhance BNI, it should also be possible, over the longer term, to isolate, sequence, and clone BNI genes from B. humidicola and introduce them into economically important field crops through genetic transformation. Building “fuel efficiency” right into the very genomes of major crops has enormous potential to cut both production costs and global agriculture’s share of greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate pollution of water.

Integrating folk and formal soil ecology

For Kenya’s small farmers, soil fertility management is not just a matter of maintaining a chemical balance in the topsoil but rather brings into play their knowledge of soil ecology. With support from Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC), researchers in CIAT’s Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF) Institute are testing an interactive learning strategy with four communities in western Kenya to promote dialog between farmers’ “folk” ecology and formal scientific knowledge.

This approach contrasts with conventional agronomic research methods, which often ignore local knowledge systems. While not a panacea, farmers’ knowledge about factors such as soil types, nutrient content, composting, and crop response to organic and inorganic amendments is vital, since it guides their decisions about farming.

Through dialog, experiment design and implementation, evaluation, and knowledge sharing between farmers, researchers, and extensionists, CIAT researchers are creating a more dynamic approach to solve soil fertility problems.

“Our project results dispel the idea that integrated soil fertility management is somehow too complicated a topic for participatory research with farmers,” says CIAT anthropologist Joshua Ramisch. “Yes, it’s complex, but farmers deal with complexity all the time—with weather, pests, diseases, soils, and multiple crops. You can use soil management as an entry point for participatory research on natural resource issues.” The challenge now, he says, is to scale up the use of community-based learning strategies so that knowledge sharing can take place among larger numbers of farmers and development partners. This is a key aim of the second 3-year phase of the project, which has continuing support from IDRC.

Strong community interest is driving the push to scale up the process. Since 2001 participating farmer groups have grown from four to twelve. Today, the groups conduct eight collective experiments and over 200 individual ones. And they’re applying soil fertility management concepts, not just to maize and beans (the region’s main staples), but also to women’s high-value vegetable crops and to other staples like millet and cassava.

Documenting the process and its results is crucial. The project team has produced a manual outlining the use of interactive learning techniques. The farmer groups have also been busy documenting their work and creating communications products, such as local language data sheets giving soil experiment results, calendars with photos and descriptions of successful practices, and short dramas, poems, and songs for building community awareness.

Estimating future health gains from biofortified crops

In a study of the potential human health benefits of breeding cassava and beans with higher micronutrient content, CIAT social scientists have come up with a wide range of possible benefit levels for the scenarios they modelled. The analysis behind these “educated guesses,” they say, suggests that the size of the benefit per population is highly context-specific, depending especially on postharvest losses of micronutrients (such as iron and vitamin A), on people’s eating habits, and on existing levels of micronutrient deficiency.

Under an optimistic scenario for Northeast Brazil, cassava rich in vitamin A could curtail ill health and deaths due to deficiency in that vitamin by 19 percent. Under a pessimistic scenario, the reduction would be only 4 percent. In the case of iron-rich beans, optimistic and pessimistic scenarios were modelled for Nicaragua as well as Northeast Brazil. In Brazil the reduction in health problems would range from 24 to 47 percent and in Nicaragua from 19 to 45 percent.

The yardstick used by the researchers is called disability adjusted life years, or DALYs. Commonly used to evaluate health interventions, this system of measurement incorporates both mortality and morbidity (sickness) into a single index of human health-related well-being.

Estimates of two key variables were used to set out the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. These were the projected postharvest losses of the micronutrients—for example, through processing of cassava into flour—and estimates of future varietal adoption rates among farmers.

Besides that, the scenarios took account of breeders’ views as to the potential increases in micronutrients they might be able to achieve under the HarvestPlus Challenge Program of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). In the case of beans, CIAT breeders expect to be able to raise iron content by 80 percent. As for cassava, specially bred varieties will likely end up having around 15 parts per million of beta-carotene, the precursor of vitamin A, versus a near-complete lack of that compound in the cassava varieties currently eaten by most people.

CIAT coordinates the crop breeding component of HarvestPlus, which is a global program. For the breeding work, it has responsibility for micronutrient biofortification of beans and cassava.

Strategies for seed security during African emergencies

Like many of the natural and human-made disasters that afflict Africa over and over, seed aid given in response to crisis has itself become chronic. So much so that several countries have seen the rapid and dramatic rise of “relief seed systems,” offering entrepreneurs opportunities to profit from the misfortune of others.

These seed systems, explains a 2004 report prepared jointly by CIAT, Catholic Relief Services (CRS), and CARE Norway, emerge from a simple sequence of events. “A disaster is declared, seed need is assumed, and then a well-established chain of suppliers moves into action.” But the automatic assumption about farmers’ need for seed, according to the researchers who conducted eight case studies in seven African countries, is faulty.

This “knee-jerk reaction,” as CIAT social scientist and study leader Louise Sperling calls it, is generally the result of lack of diagnosis and analysis at the outset of an emergency. The research results show that during events such as drought, floods, and war, farmers actually get most of their seed from local channels. The study confirms the “availability of seed on a large scale” even when outside aid is being offered, suggesting that local seed systems are more resilient than governments and relief agencies have generally thought.

“We now know that sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something,” says Sperling. “There are ways of responding that may undermine agricultural systems, and there are ways to stabilize and strengthen them.” By adding a learning component to seed aid, she adds, practitioners increase the probability of long-term benefits from current and future interventions.

The case studies were conducted jointly with public and private organizations involved in seed relief work in Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Funding was provided by the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

A series of 12 “practice briefs—on topics such as seed system security assessment, agrobiodiversity and relief, the introduction of new crop varieties, and a checklist for preparing seed security proposals—has been produced for seed aid practitioners. These will be available in print and on the World Wide Web from CIAT and other organizations by late 2005. A manual for rapidly assessing seed system security in the field during or before an emergency is also near completion.

Fighting food insecurity through agroenterprise development in Haiti

Haiti’s chronic vulnerability to political and other types of upheaval is accompanied by the unfortunate distinction of being the poorest country of the Americas. The causal links among grinding poverty, loss of forest cover, the effects of natural disasters (such as deadly flooding in 2004), the shoe-horning of 8.5 million people into the western third of an island that covers only 76,000 square kilometers, an intense dry season that bakes the soil, and lack of economic opportunity are hard to untangle. But together they spell a perennial threat: food insecurity for millions of poor people.

CIAT is working closely with World Vision to tackle this issue by assisting farmer groups in three target areas with the establishment of seed production systems and other agroenterprises. In cooperation with the Ministry of Agriculture, CIAT staff are also building R&D capacity among government institutions and community groups.

A continuing concern about food security is the need for a timely and large enough supply of good-quality seed. “There’s always a shortage during the planting season,” says Aart van Schoonhoven, former director of CIAT’s Agronatura Science Park. “Aid agencies are always worried that farmers will be forced to eat their seed rather than plant it.”

In the case of dry beans, a key source of dietary protein, farmers usually buy seed at local food markets and therefore have little idea of the nonobvious traits that the resulting crop will display. Under a 2-year project that began in mid-2004, CIAT is working with local community groups to set up bean seed production systems. The first farmer cooperative was formed in late 2004. Technicians and farmers have been trained to establish and manage local seed production and commercialization.
CIAT and World Vision are also helping community groups set up solar cassava-drying enterprises to supply the animal feed market. Inexpensive and easy to manage, the drying plants provide a model for development in other communities.

To enhance the effectiveness of these efforts, CIAT is introducing participatory extension methods, which help fuse local knowledge with formal science. In the hands of technicians with World Vision and other NGOs, these methods contribute to wider adoption of technical innovations.

Combining disease resistance with consumer tastes in cassava

With funding from the Rockefeller Foundation, CIAT began an ambitious 6-year effort in 2003 to help Tanzania exploit recent genetic improvements to cassava, an important food staple. The idea was to transfer new disease- and pest-resistant cassava genotypes from CIAT in Colombia to Africa and then cross them with local cultivars to produce cassava suited to African conditions. Now, 2 years later, hundreds of plants are growing in the Tanzanian crossing block. The symptoms of cassava mosaic disease (CMD), which appeared shortly after planting and had scientists worried about a possible breakdown of their germplasm’s CMD resistance, have vanished. The plants are strong and healthy.

The CMD resistance is particularly important since this disease is found only in Africa and is highly destructive. Moreover, an aggressive strain of the plant virus that causes CMD, spread by whiteflies, has been devastating crops in eastern Africa for more than a decade. In Uganda in the mid-1990s, it even triggered deadly famine in some areas.

About 12 years ago, a new source of CMD resistance was discovered by CIAT’s sister center, the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). Later, CIAT identified molecular markers for the gene responsible for the resistance. The markers allow for accelerated breeding, a big plus given the long growth cycle of cassava. Under the Tanzanian project, national scientists are being trained in marker-assisted selection methods.

The experimental cassava also possesses New World genetic diversity, which African breeders can now exploit for various purposes—to alter plant architecture for easier weeding, boost the protein content, or improve nutrition, for example. Broadening the gene pool will create alternatives for both African breeders and farmers, such as cassava production for industrial starch. “We’re giving the farmers not only new materials but new economic opportunities,” says CIAT molecular geneticist Martin Fregene.

But breeding cassava for home consumption and to meet consumer food preferences is also important. “The local varieties are very good for giving the right quality of flour,” notes Edward Kanju, an IITA cassava breeder working in a Rockefeller Foundation-funded project on resistance to cassava brown streak disease in eastern Africa. “What we will do now is select genotypes that combine both sets of traits.”

The final test of success, though, will be acceptance of new varieties by producers. To ensure research relevance, the project calls for strong farmer participation through varietal testing and selection of crosses.

Participatory rice research: An entry point for crop diversification

For many people rice conjures up the image of a big internationally traded commodity, a cash crop produced on large tracts of irrigated land using modern mechanized methods. But in Central America, as in many other parts of the world, this image doesn’t fit reality. In Nicaragua, for example, about two-thirds of rice production is cultivated under rainfed conditions, most often by small farmers using traditional techniques.

CIAT’s rice research project focuses on these small producers and, to a lesser extent, on medium-scale producers in Latin America. While upland rice provides them with some cash and a measure of food security, the international price is so low that earnings are rarely enough to pull rural families out of poverty.

In collaboration with France’s Center for International Cooperation in Agricultural Research for Development (CIRAD), CIAT has been working since May 2002 with more than 100 farmers and farmer groups in Nicaragua to improve and select varieties of upland rice. “Nicaragua is a good laboratory and testing ground,” says rice breeder Gilles Trouche, who coordinates CIAT and CIRAD’s participatory rice research in that country. “It is very representative of Central America, where upland rice is grown under a range of agroecological conditions using diverse cultural practices.”

Part of the poverty-alleviation rationale for the participatory research is that improved rice production—made possible by varieties that yield better, mature earlier, or tolerate drought—will give farmers greater flexibility in their use of land and labor. This in turn will allow them to more easily diversify into higher value crops, without losing the food security provided by rice. Participatory research on rice (as well as sorghum) also provides a practical entry point for building farmers’ capacity to innovate and organize, says CIAT’s rice research project manager Lee Calvert.

Varietal selections were made from a range of available CIAT and CIRAD germplasm by participating farmer-researchers during 2003 and 2004 in four different rice ecosystems. In 2005, six promising rice lines entered the validation phase, in which they will be evaluated in commercial plots by larger groups of farmers—the final step before new varieties are officially released by INTA, Nicaragua’s National Institute of Agricultural Technology.

The project has helped, in a modest but real way, to strengthen these farmer groups. “In addition to the new skills they have acquired,” says Trouche, “they are also better now at interacting with scientists and presenting experiment results to other farmers.”

Prize-winning collaboration to protect plantain

Smallholder farmers in Colombia have been working with international and national scientists and extension agents for the past 3 years to save their stands of plantain from bacterial wilt—“moko” in Spanish. Among the promising weapons in the emerging arsenal is a liquid biocide that does double duty as an organic fertilizer.

Called a lixivium, the liquid is produced inexpensively on-farm by composting plantain residues, specifically the hanging, spine-like shafts called rachises from which the flowers and fruit protrude. This is the part of the plant that farmers routinely discard after harvest.

“We wanted to give the farmers simple, easy-to-use solutions because they don’t like complex technology,” says Silverio González, director of Colombia’s National Federation of Plantain Producers (FEDEPLATANO) and chief designer of the composting system. “Our members prefer to solve problems using their own local resources.” The lixivium biocide is much more environmentally friendly than the formaldehyde farmers typically use to disinfect soils.

CIAT’s collaborative work with FEDEPLATANO and other organizations over the past 3 years, via a broad alliance called Club del Moko, was one of three winners at Innovation Marketplace 2004. The exhibition-cum-competition is designed to strengthen partnerships between centers of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and civil society organizations. The winners were announced during the CGIAR’s annual general meeting at Mexico City in October 2004.

CIAT plant pathologist Elizabeth Alvarez, who has long experience in farmer participatory research, has worked with FEDEPLATANO on several aspects of moko control. She has also collaborated with the Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research (CORPOICA), a Club del Moko member, to study the genetic diversity of the bacterium that causes moko, Ralstonia solanacearum. Using molecular markers, Alvarez and colleagues identified 68 strains in samples of plant tissues, soil, water, and insects. However, detecting the bacteria not only in the laboratory but also in farmers’ fields is essential to make best use of control measures like the lixivium. Development of an on-farm diagnostic kit is therefore a priority in the next research phase.

Indigenous agroforestry: A bright spot in land management

A form of agroforestry practiced by 6,000 hillside farm families in Honduras has proven highly successful at not only protecting land and water resources but also improving rural livelihoods. Known as Quesungual agroforestry, this indigenous farming system was enhanced and promoted under a project launched by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in the early 1990s.

In a recent evaluation of that experience, scientists from CIAT and FAO conclude that the Quesungual system, or elements of it, could be successfully adapted for use in highland areas of Africa, Asia, and South America. Their evaluation was part of the “Bright Spots” Project, carried out by a consortium of nine institutions, including CIAT.

Quesungual is the village in western Honduras from which the agroforestry system takes its name. Under this form of natural resource management and cropping, native trees share space with field crops such as beans, maize, sorghum, millet, and forage grasses, as well as newer high-value crops, mostly fruits and vegetables. The hillside trees are carefully pruned to reduce nutrient competition with food and forage crops and to provide mulch.
The system contrasts strongly with the slash-and-burn shifting agriculture typically practiced in the highlands of Central America. Under the Quesungual system, farmers never burn the hillside vegetation as a way to prepare land. And they use no-till and direct seeding methods for food crop cultivation. That way the land is permanently covered, protecting soil from two extremes to which the region is prone: torrential rains, which cause severe erosion, and drought, which saps soil moisture.

The evaluation report notes that farmers were able to double both bean and maize yields. This allowed them to meet their own household food needs and still have a surplus to sell. Their higher incomes have allowed farmers to invest in higher value crops like vegetables and fruits, and to buy chickens and pigs. The evaluation study authors also comment that enhanced access to credit, along with policies on burning, overgrazing, and water management, were essential to the project’s success.

Building an arable layer of soil in the savannas

Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, and other countries endowed with vast tropical savannas have great expectations for these resources. They see them as a last frontier of arable land, a means of expanding crop production and generating regional economic wealth within their borders. But, as the research experience of CIAT and other scientists has demonstrated, this will be nothing but a pipe dream unless the currently infertile, degraded soils of the savannas can first be built up—almost from scratch.

Savanna soils are often acidic, high in aluminum (which is toxic to plants), and low in organic matter. Without dramatic improvements in the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of these Oxisols and Ultisols, it won’t be possible to introduce sustainable, no-till crop agriculture.

CIAT has worked on the problems of savanna soils for about 30 years, using an area of Colombia’s Eastern Plains called the Altillanura as its living laboratory. With Colombian partner organizations, it has designed a two-phase set of soil management practices for building an arable layer.

In the first phase, aimed at improving the soil’s physical and chemical properties, the earth is cultivated with a rigid set of curved chisels that reach a depth of 30 centimeters. This tillage system replaces traditional disk harrowing, which penetrates the native savanna only 5 to 8 centimeters. This first phase also includes the application of chemical fertilizers to build up essential nutrients.

Next is the biological phase. Forage grasses and legumes adapted to tropical savanna conditions are planted. Taking advantage of the loosened soil and nutrient bonus, these plants produce abundant root systems that penetrate the full profile of the topsoil. As the soil improves in fertility and structure, it becomes more suitable for direct sowing of commercial crops such as maize, soybean, and rice. In the cropping phase of this soil-building exercise, farmers are advised to follow specific crop and pasture rotations in their newly emerging agropastoral systems, based on improved germplasm.

“We’re making productive an area that has been unproductive for so many years,” says CIAT soil physicist Edgar Amézquita. He adds that the arable layer system is not only technically feasible but also economically attractive to farmers. In a 2004 study of the potential impact of these technologies, the three agropastoral options evaluated by Amézquita and colleagues all scored high for potential profitability. Expressed as internal rates of return, scores ranged from 20 to 57 percent.

CIAT’s principal partners in this work are CORPOICA, the National Program for the Transfer of Agricultural Technology (PRONATTA), the Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology (COLCIENCIAS), and the Colombian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.

 


 

[<< previous theme] [next theme >>]


Copyright © Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical 2001.  All rights reserved.