| Table 1. Highest degree level of CGIAR social scientists |
| Highest
Degree Level |
Percent |
Number |
Average years since completion of this degree |
| BA/BSc |
1.6% |
2 |
17.5 |
| MA/MSc |
23.8% |
30 |
7.97 |
| PhD |
72.2% |
91 |
9.73 |
| Other |
2.4% |
3 |
11.33 |
| Total |
100% |
126 |
9.47 |
| Table 1.1. Highest degree level of CGIAR social scientists w/o
economists |
| Highest
Degree Level |
Percent |
Number |
Average years since completion of this degree |
| BA/BSc |
3.8% |
2 |
17.5 |
| MA/MSc |
28.3% |
15 |
6.67 |
| PhD |
64.2% |
34 |
8 |
| Other |
3.8% |
2 |
16 |
| Total |
100.0% |
53 |
8.28 |
| Table 1.2. Highest degree level of CGIAR economists only |
| Highest
Degree Level |
Percent |
Number |
Average years since completion of this degree |
| BA/BSc |
0.0% |
0 |
0 |
| MA/MSc |
20.5% |
15 |
9.27 |
| PhD |
78.1% |
57 |
10.78 |
| Other |
1.4% |
1 |
2 |
| Total |
100.0% |
73 |
10.34 |
| Table 2.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR social scientists |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) |
27 |
15 |
1 |
|
| 62.80% |
34.90% |
2.30% |
|
| Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) |
15 |
7 |
1 |
|
| 65.20% |
30.40% |
4.30% |
|
| IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA |
49 |
8 |
|
3 |
| 81.70% |
13.30% |
|
5.00% |
| Total |
91 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
| 72.20% |
23.80% |
1.60% |
2.40% |
| Table 2.1.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR social scientists w/o economists |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) |
11 |
9 |
1 |
|
| 52.4% |
42.9% |
4.8% |
|
| Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) |
7 |
4 |
1 |
|
| 58.3% |
33.3% |
8.3% |
|
| IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA |
16 |
2 |
|
2 |
| 80.00% |
10.0% |
|
10.0% |
| Total |
34 |
15 |
2 |
2 |
| 64.2% |
28.3% |
3.8% |
3.8% |
| Table 2.1.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR economists only |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) |
16 |
6 |
|
|
| 72.70% |
27.3% |
|
|
| Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) |
8 |
3 |
|
|
| 72.70% |
27.3% |
|
|
| IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA |
33 |
6 |
|
1 |
| 82.50% |
15.0% |
|
2.5% |
| Total |
57 |
15 |
|
1 |
| 78.10% |
20.5% |
|
1.4% |
| Table 2.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR social scientists |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM |
27 |
8 |
|
|
| 77.1% |
22.9% |
|
|
| Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT |
15 |
7 |
1 |
|
| 65.2% |
30.4% |
4.3% |
|
| NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR |
12 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
| 52.2% |
30.4% |
4.3% |
13.0% |
| Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR |
37 |
8 |
|
|
| 82.2% |
17.8% |
|
|
| Total |
91 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
| 72.2% |
23.8% |
1.6% |
2.4% |
| Table 2.2.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR social scientists w/o economists |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM |
10 |
3 |
|
|
| 76.9% |
23.1% |
|
|
| Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT |
7 |
4 |
1 |
|
| 58.3% |
33.3% |
8.3% |
|
| NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR |
8 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
| 47.1% |
35.3% |
5.9% |
11.8% |
| Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR |
9 |
2 |
|
|
| 81.8% |
18.2% |
|
|
| Total |
34 |
15 |
2 |
2 |
| 64.2% |
28.3% |
3.8% |
3.8% |
| Table 2.2.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of
CGIAR economists only |
| Type of
Center |
PhD
% |
MA/MSc
% |
BA/BSc
% |
Other
% |
| Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM |
17 |
5 |
|
|
| 77.3% |
22.7% |
|
|
| Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT |
8 |
3 |
|
|
| 72.7% |
27.3% |
|
|
| NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR |
4 |
1 |
|
1 |
| 66.7% |
16.7% |
|
16.7% |
| Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR |
28.00% |
6 |
|
|
| 82.4% |
17.60% |
|
|
| Total |
57 |
15 |
|
1 |
| 78.1% |
20.5% |
|
1.4% |
| Table 3. Gender of CGIAR social scientists |
| Gender |
Percent |
Number |
| Men |
68% |
86 |
| Women |
32% |
40 |
| Total |
100% |
126 |
| Table 3.1. Gender of CGIAR social scientists w/o economists |
| Gender |
Percent |
Number |
| Men |
64.2% |
34 |
| Women |
35.8% |
19 |
| Total |
100.0% |
53 |
| Table 3.2. Gender of CGIAR economists only |
| Gender |
Percent |
Number |
| Men |
71.2% |
52 |
| Women |
28.8% |
21 |
| Total |
100.0% |
73 |
| Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR |
| Length
of service |
Percent |
Number |
| 2
years or less |
23.0% |
29 |
| 3 - 5
years |
27.0% |
34 |
| More
than 5 years |
46.8% |
59 |
| Total |
96.8% |
122 |
| Missing |
3.2% |
4 |
| Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR w/o economists |
| Length
of service |
Percent |
Number |
| 2
years or less |
24.5% |
13 |
| 3 - 5
years |
26.4% |
14 |
| More
than 5 years |
45.3% |
24 |
| Total |
96.2% |
51 |
| Missing |
3.8% |
2 |
| Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR economists only |
| Length
of service |
Percent |
Number |
| 2
years or less |
21.9% |
16 |
| 3 - 5
years |
27.4% |
20 |
| More
than 5 years |
47.9% |
35 |
| Total |
97.3% |
71 |
| Missing |
2.7% |
2 |
| Table 5. Type of position w/o economists |
| Type
of position |
Percent |
Number |
| Senior
Mng. |
5.7% |
3 |
| Middle
Mng. |
7.5% |
4 |
| IRS |
66.0% |
35 |
| NRS |
13.2% |
7 |
| Other |
7.5% |
4 |
| Total |
100.0% |
53 |
| Table 5. Type of position for economists only |
| Type
of position |
Percent |
Number |
| Senior
Mng. |
6.8% |
5 |
| Middle
Mng. |
11.0% |
8 |
| IRS |
58.9% |
43 |
| NRS |
13.7% |
10 |
| Other |
9.6% |
7 |
| Total |
100.0% |
73 |
| Table 6. Discipline, length of service |
| Discipline |
Percent
(N) |
Average years of service
(Range) |
Minimum |
Maximum |
| Antropology, sociology & related fields (political science,
policy, communications, extension education) |
21% |
6.48 |
0 |
16 |
| 26 |
16 |
| Economics |
58% |
7.77 |
0 |
26 |
| 73 |
26 |
| Ecology (human / social ecology, other fields in ecology) |
2% |
15.5 |
6 |
25 |
| 2 |
19 |
| Geography (human / social geografy, other fields in geografy) |
6% |
2.38 |
1 |
7 |
| 8 |
6 |
| Other |
14% |
6.49 |
0 |
20 |
| 17 |
20 |
| Total |
100% |
7.11 |
0 |
26 |
| 126 |
26 |
| Table 7. Discipline and type of position |
| Discipline |
Senior Management
% |
Middle Management
% |
IRS
% |
NRS
% |
Other
% |
| Antropology, sociology & related fields (political science,
policy, communications, extension education) |
2 |
1 |
18 |
4 |
1 |
| 7.70% |
3.80% |
69.20% |
15.40% |
3.80% |
| Economics |
5 |
8 |
43 |
10 |
7 |
| 6.80% |
11.00% |
58.90% |
13.70% |
9.60% |
| Ecology (human / social ecology, other fields in ecology) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
| Geography (human / social geografy, other fields in geografy) |
|
1 |
5 |
|
2 |
|
12.50% |
62.50% |
|
25.00% |
| Other |
1 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
| 5.90% |
11.80% |
58.80% |
17.60% |
5.90% |
| Total |
8 |
12 |
78 |
17 |
11 |
| 6.30% |
9.50% |
61.90% |
13.50% |
8.70% |
| Table 8. Relationships to funding from Core, Special projects,
SWPs |
| Type
of position |
Core funded positions
% |
Special project /competitive grant funded
% |
Systemwide Programs
% |
Seconded to CGIAR
% |
| Senior Management |
6 |
1 |
|
1 |
| 75.00% |
12.50% |
|
12.50% |
| Middle Managemant |
10 |
2 |
|
|
| 83.30% |
16.70% |
|
|
| IRS |
29 |
33 |
4 |
11 |
| 37.20% |
42.30% |
5.10% |
14.10% |
| NRS |
5 |
10 |
|
1 |
| 29.40% |
58.80% |
|
5.90% |
| Other |
|
3 |
1 |
6 |
|
27.30% |
9.10% |
54.50% |
|