Social Research Conference
Agenda (in PDF format, 123 kb)
Participation
Call for Papers
Abstracts and Papers
Background
Objectives
Expected Products
Survey Results
International Steering Committee
Distinguished Participants

Services Offered by CIAT's Systems Information Unit
Venue (CIAT Convention Center Web site)

Home > Social Research Conference >

t_Survey_Results.gif (2117 bytes)


src.gif (16042 bytes)



For further information contact: Andrés Palau
 
Table 1. Highest degree level of CGIAR social scientists
Highest Degree Level Percent Number Average years since completion of this degree
BA/BSc 1.6% 2 17.5
MA/MSc 23.8% 30 7.97
PhD 72.2% 91 9.73
Other 2.4% 3 11.33
Total 100% 126 9.47

 

Table 1.1. Highest degree level of CGIAR social scientists w/o economists
Highest Degree Level Percent Number Average years since completion of this degree
BA/BSc 3.8% 2 17.5
MA/MSc 28.3% 15 6.67
PhD 64.2% 34 8
Other 3.8% 2 16
Total 100.0% 53 8.28

 

Table 1.2. Highest degree level of CGIAR economists only
Highest Degree Level Percent Number Average years since completion of this degree
BA/BSc 0.0% 0 0
MA/MSc 20.5% 15 9.27
PhD 78.1% 57 10.78
Other 1.4% 1 2
Total 100.0% 73 10.34

 

Table 2.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR social scientists
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) 27 15 1  
62.80% 34.90% 2.30%  
Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) 15 7 1  
65.20% 30.40% 4.30%  
IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA 49 8   3
81.70% 13.30%   5.00%
Total 91 30 2 3
72.20% 23.80% 1.60% 2.40%

 

Table 2.1.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR social scientists w/o economists
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) 11 9 1  
52.4% 42.9% 4.8%  
Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) 7 4 1  
58.3% 33.3% 8.3%  
IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA 16 2   2
80.00% 10.0%   10.0%
Total 34 15 2 2
64.2% 28.3% 3.8% 3.8%

 

Table 2.1.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR economists only
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity (CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, ICRAF, ICLARM) 16 6    
72.70% 27.3%    
Ecoregional (CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT) 8 3    
72.70% 27.3%    
IFPRI, ISNAR, Bioversity , IWMI, CIFOR, ILRI, WARDA 33 6   1
82.50% 15.0%   2.5%
Total 57 15   1
78.10% 20.5%   1.4%

 

Table 2.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR social scientists
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM 27 8    
77.1% 22.9%    
Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT 15 7 1  
65.2% 30.4% 4.3%  
NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR 12 7 1 3
52.2% 30.4% 4.3% 13.0%
Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR 37 8    
82.2% 17.8%    
Total 91 30 2 3
72.2% 23.8% 1.6% 2.4%

 

Table 2.2.1. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR social scientists w/o economists
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM 10 3    
76.9% 23.1%    
Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT 7 4 1  
58.3% 33.3% 8.3%  
NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR 8 6 1 2
47.1% 35.3% 5.9% 11.8%
Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR 9 2    
81.8% 18.2%    
Total 34 15 2 2
64.2% 28.3% 3.8% 3.8%

 

Table 2.2.2. Distribution by type of center and degree level of CGIAR economists only
Type of Center PhD
%		 MA/MSc
%		 BA/BSc
%		 Other
%
Commodity: CIMMYT, IRRI, CIP, WARDA, ILRI, ICLARM 17 5    
77.3% 22.7%    
Ecoregional (with commodity): CIAT, IITA, ICARDA, ICRISAT 8 3    
72.7% 27.3%    
NRM: IWMI, Bioversity , ICRAF, CIFOR 4 1   1
66.7% 16.7%   16.7%
Public policy: IFPRI, ISNAR 28.00% 6    
82.4% 17.60%    
Total 57 15   1
78.1% 20.5%   1.4%

 

Table 3. Gender of CGIAR social scientists
Gender Percent Number
Men 68% 86
Women 32% 40
Total 100% 126

 

Table 3.1. Gender of CGIAR social scientists w/o economists
Gender Percent Number
Men 64.2% 34
Women 35.8% 19
Total 100.0% 53

 

Table 3.2. Gender of CGIAR economists only
Gender Percent Number
Men 71.2% 52
Women 28.8% 21
Total 100.0% 73

 

Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR
Length of service Percent Number
2 years or less 23.0% 29
3 - 5 years 27.0% 34
More than 5 years 46.8% 59
Total 96.8% 122
Missing 3.2% 4

 

Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR w/o economists
Length of service Percent Number
2 years or less 24.5% 13
3 - 5 years 26.4% 14
More than 5 years 45.3% 24
Total 96.2% 51
Missing 3.8% 2

 

Table 4. Total length of service in the CGIAR economists only
Length of service Percent Number
2 years or less 21.9% 16
3 - 5 years 27.4% 20
More than 5 years 47.9% 35
Total 97.3% 71
Missing 2.7% 2

 

Table 5. Type of position w/o economists
Type of position Percent Number
Senior Mng. 5.7% 3
Middle Mng. 7.5% 4
IRS 66.0% 35
NRS 13.2% 7
Other 7.5% 4
Total 100.0% 53

 

Table 5. Type of position for economists only
Type of position Percent Number
Senior Mng. 6.8% 5
Middle Mng. 11.0% 8
IRS 58.9% 43
NRS 13.7% 10
Other 9.6% 7
Total 100.0% 73

 

Table 6. Discipline, length of service
Discipline Percent
(N)		 Average years of service
(Range)		 Minimum Maximum
Antropology, sociology & related fields (political science, policy, communications, extension education) 21% 6.48 0 16
26 16
Economics 58% 7.77 0 26
73 26
Ecology (human / social ecology, other fields in ecology) 2% 15.5 6 25
2 19
Geography (human / social geografy, other fields in geografy) 6% 2.38 1 7
8 6
Other 14% 6.49 0 20
17 20
Total 100% 7.11 0 26
126 26

 

Table 7. Discipline and type of position
Discipline Senior Management
%		 Middle Management
%		 IRS
%		 NRS
%		 Other
%
Antropology, sociology & related fields (political science, policy, communications, extension education) 2 1 18 4 1
7.70% 3.80% 69.20% 15.40% 3.80%
Economics 5 8 43 10 7
6.80% 11.00% 58.90% 13.70% 9.60%
Ecology (human / social ecology, other fields in ecology)     2    
  100.00%    
Geography (human / social geografy, other fields in geografy)   1 5   2
12.50% 62.50%   25.00%
Other 1 2 10 3 1
5.90% 11.80% 58.80% 17.60% 5.90%
Total 8 12 78 17 11
6.30% 9.50% 61.90% 13.50% 8.70%

 

Table 8. Relationships to funding from Core, Special projects, SWPs
Type of position Core funded positions

%		 Special project /competitive grant funded
%		 Systemwide Programs
%		 Seconded to CGIAR
%
Senior Management 6 1   1
75.00% 12.50%   12.50%
Middle Managemant 10 2    
83.30% 16.70%    
IRS 29 33 4 11
37.20% 42.30% 5.10% 14.10%
NRS 5 10   1
29.40% 58.80%   5.90%
Other   3 1 6
27.30% 9.10% 54.50%