Human activities like burning gasoline in cars, logging, and clearing land for agriculture
are causing several gases to build up in the earths atmosphere. The concentration of
carbon dioxide (CO2), for example, is 29 percent greater than it was before the Industrial
Revolution and higher than at any time in the last 160,000 years. Much of the increase is
due to the nearly 6 billion tons of carbon (or 22 billion tons of carbon dioxide) that
human beings annually contribute to the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. Many climate
experts believe the increased concentrations of CO2, methane, nitrous oxides, and certain
other gases are magnifyingto dangerous levelsan otherwise beneficial natural
phenomenon known as the greenhouse effect.Although greenhouse gases together make up
less than one-tenth of 1 percent of our atmosphere, they act as a kind of thermal blanket
around the whole earth. They prevent a significant amount of incoming solar energy from
being radiated back out into space. This makes our planet about 30 Celcius degrees warmer
than if those gases werent presentwarm enough to support life as we know it.
What worries many scientists is that this blanket is getting thicker as the proportion
of greenhouse gases increases because of human influences. This, they argue, may be
causing a dangerous rise in the average temperature of our planets atmosphere. It is
estimated that the global temperature would increase by between 1 and 3.5 degrees Celsius
if CO2 concentrations were to double. At our current rate of ejecting carbon into the
atmosphere, this would happen before the end of the 21st century.
A higher global temperature threatens to raise sea levels and alter regional climate
patterns. Such changes could trigger major disruptions around the world in the coming
century. Food production patterns could shift as agriculture becomes more difficult in
some areas and easier in others. Large numbers of plant and animal species, unable to
adapt rapidly enough to environmental change, could become extinct. Forests, water
supplies, and shorelines could be threatened. Economic growth in many areas could be
severely stunted, especially in developing countries, resulting in greater poverty.
How do Plants Capture and Store Carbon Dioxide?
Photosynthesis is the production of organic molecules from inorganic molecules by
plants as well as certain bacteria and algae. In plants, cell pigments called chlorophylls
trap light from the sun. The photochemical reactions in this first phase of photosynthesis
produce energy-rich compounds and release oxygen. In the second phase, enzymes in the
plant use these compounds to "fix" carbon dioxide. That is, they combine
atmospheric CO2 with these other compounds to form organic compounds for plant nutrition
and growth. Much of this locked-up carbon is recycled into the soil as plant matter such
as leaves die and decay, and as worms and microorganisms like bacteria break down the
organic matter.
Why are Plants Ability to Store Carbon Crucial to Protecting the
Earths Atmosphere?
Through photosynthesis, the earths vegetative cover is a key component in the
global carbon cycle. Forests and grasslands (as well as the oceans) serve as vast carbon
reservoirs, or "sinks," because of their ability to absorb CO2 from the
atmosphere. By reducing our carbon emissions and increasing the extent of the earths
plant coverfor example, by protecting forestshuman beings can slow down or
even reverse the buildup of atmospheric CO2.
What is the Significance of Deep-rooted African Grasses in Storing Carbon?
In parts of South America, particularly Brazil, many cattle producers in recent years
have been planting deep-rooted grasses, originally from Africa, as forage for their herds.
More productive than native savanna grasses, these introduced grasses are often mixed with
pasture legumes to improve animal nutrition and soil fertility. Research by the
International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) in Colombia has shown that the
African grasses also have the ability to store large amounts of carbon deep in the
soilmuch more than previously estimated. Whats more, the Centers work
indicates that grass-legume combinations result in greater carbon storage than that seen
with native savanna grasses or with African grasses alone. Because of the vast surface
area of savannas in South America and their wide use in raising livestock, the research
suggests that African grasses, as natural carbon "sinks" or reservoirs, have
enormous potential for slowing CO2-related global warming while improving agricultural
productivity.
Why was the Carbon Storage Potential of Savanna Grasses Previously
Underestimated?
According to Myles Fisher, a plant physiologist with CIAT, it was largely because of
the way scientists measured grassland productivity in past decades. They were then mainly
interested in the above-ground production of biomass by grassesthe forage available
for grazing animals. Estimates typically did not include root production and decaying
plant debris in the soil. Both literally and figuratively, scientists werent digging
deep enough to get to the root of the carbon-storage issue.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, other researchers made a major contribution to
understanding soil organic matter by looking deeper into the soil, down to 15 centimeters
(about 6 inches). Their estimates of grassland productivity shot up, to as much as five
times the value of the earlier figures.
For many years CIAT has emphasized plants for cattle fodder that tolerate dry spells
and can thrive in infertile soils like the acid savannas of South America, which are low
in phosphorus and calcium. So its scientists were naturally interested in grasses with
robust roots that can grow deep in the soil to pick up nutrients and water. This led them
to look even deeper into the soil, down a meter or so, to observe the dynamics of
pastures, especially the buildup of soil organic matter. Their data suggest that a single
hectare of pasture planted to deep-rooted grasses of African origin can store as much as
15 tons of carbon per hectare each year, though it is not yet known how this rate changes
over the longer term.
What are the UN Framework Convention and Kyoto Protocol?
In centuries gone by, "the global climate changed human beings. Now human beings
seem to be changing the global climate." This disturbing reversal of roles is the
motive behind the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. This international
treaty was signed by 165 states and took effect in March 1994. Its main aim is to
stabilize "greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would
prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate
system." The Convention didnt lay out a specific blueprint for tackling the
problems of climate change. Rather, it established a process whereby countries could agree
on specific actions for the future.
The future has arrived. In December 1997, an international agreement was struck in
Kyoto, Japan, on reduction of emissions of six greenhouse gases. The Kyoto Protocol
contains legally binding targets for emissions of industrialized countries. They must
reduce their combined emissions by at least 5 percent by the period 2008-2012, calculated
as an average over these five years. According to the United Nations Environment
Programme, "the Protocol will result in 2010 emissions levels that are approximately
29 percent below what they would have been in the absence of the Protocol."
While the UN Framework Convention set the stage for monitoring and cutting greenhouse
gas emissions through protocols like the one negotiated in Kyoto, it also encourages other
actions. It specifically calls for more scientific research on climate change and for
countries to prepare inventories of sinks for greenhouse gases such as grasslands and
forests.
Email Page Link to a Friend
|